![The portrait of Charles John Huffman Dickens (1812-1870). The author is wearing a dark jacket and cravat, white waistcoat, and his dark hair is collar-length with long curls, 1843. Picture: Philip Mould and Company](https://cdn.24.co.za/files/Cms/General/d/8089/081e3fa8d7e9447eb8e257b4d994bf12.jpg)
A youthful portrait of British writer Charles Dickens that went missing for 150 years will go on display in London this week after being found covered in mould next to a metal lobster at a market in South Africa.
The miniature watercolour and gouache portrait by Margaret Gillies, valued at £220 000 (nearly R4 million), was painted in 1843 as the young Dickens, in his early 30s, was writing A Christmas Carol.
The painting shows the Victorian writer clean shaven, with long, wavy hair, looking over his left shoulder, a contrast to the more common image of an ageing Dickens, with long bushy beard and messy, balding hair.
The portrait was last on public display in 1844 at the Royal Academy of Arts in London, only to then disappear some time after, with Gillies writing in a letter in the 1860s that she was unsure of its whereabouts. After a fruitless search, she reported it unaccounted for in 1886.
The 14cm high oval portrait was found late last year in KwaZulu-Natal by an unknown buyer and has since been restored.
London Art dealers Philip Mould and Company now own the painting, which will go on display at the Charles Dickens Museum this week.
“Dickens was a celebrity, people followed him down the street and so with that dramatic twist of the head she has caught that, she has caught the man that turned heads himself,” Philip Mould told Reuters.
It is unknown how exactly the portrait moved from London to South Africa. One theory offered by the dealers is that the portrait was taken to South Africa by family friends of the Dickens and Gillies family.
The Dickens Museum, situated at the author’s former home, is trying to raise money to buy the portrait at a reduced price of £180 000.
“This must never escape again. This is such an important, emotive face at such a critical time in his career,” Mould added.
According to Mould, the portrait was first mentioned by the author in a letter dated to a day that he was sitting for Gillies.
Until now the portrait has been known only by a simplified black-and-white print, which has none of the brilliance of the original and which formed the frontispiece of a book entitled A New Spirit of the Age (1844).
According to the dealer’s website, despite attempts to locate the portrait during her lifetime, even Gillies herself was at a loss to know what had happened to it.
When it was rediscovered in KwaZulu-Natal, a layer of mould was obscuring part of Dickens’ body.
“Every now and then something comes through our doors that alone justifies a career devoted to the research and representation of historical art. When the small package finally arrived at our gallery on a Monday morning in spring, it represented just such a moment. Although covered with a particularly virulent species of South African mould, following its unwrapping Dickens’ indomitable expression was still as affecting as it had been to the Victorian audience of the Royal Academy when it was last seen in public 174 years ago. It was an electrifying moment for us all,” said Mould.