Share

Woman's buttocks in a G-string not inappropriate or harmful to children, ad watchdog rules

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
The Sex Expo advert depicting a woman's butt with a g-string on not inappropriate (ARB)
The Sex Expo advert depicting a woman's butt with a g-string on not inappropriate (ARB)
  • Some 13 South Africans formally complained to the local ad regulator that an advert by The Sex Expo depicting a woman's buttocks in a G-string is offensive and harmful to children.
  • Some of the complainants argue the ad is exposing children to pornography and degrading to women.
  • The Advertising Regulatory Board noted the ad might be disturbing, but it is not inappropriate, harmful to children, and does not objectify women.
  • For more stories, visit the Tech and Trends homepage.

South Africa's Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB) found nothing wrong with The Sex Expo's advert of a woman's buttocks in a G-string after 13 complainants said it was offensive, degrading to women, and harmful to children.

One complainant said the poster contained "inappropriate visuals in public areas", while another said the ad showed an "explicit picture of a woman's half-naked backside" and was "degrading to women and offensive".

Three others, concerned about their children, said the advert was inappropriate for minors and made it difficult to "explain the reason for the signboards".

"My children are exposed to sex as a commodity and to women depicted as objects.

"The visual of this advert undermines the value of women. In an age where human trafficking is rife, this is a grossly misplaced advertisement," added one complainant.   

"This is absolutely disgusting, as I use this road every day for my school lifts for my young kids. Our kids are being exposed to pornography on their way to school," said another.

Buttocks are not a problem

According to the ad watchdog, adverts were not supposed to "offend against good taste or decency or be offensive to public or sectoral values and sensitivities".

They should not contain anything that's likely to "cause serious or widespread or sectoral offence", it said.

Although the ARB noted the concern about the image on the poster, it states the photo in itself was not offensive.

"No inappropriate body parts are shown, and the image isn't depicting any sensual act.

"The same image could be used to sell underwear, or be seen on a beach, without the same level of concern.

"It would therefore appear that it is not actually the image that is causing offence but the context."

The only issue is the image promotes The Sex Expo, which is associated with sex, therefore making people uncomfortable.

"It is, in fact, the existence of The Sex Expo that is making many viewers feel uncomfortable.

"However, publicly mentioning sex and selling sex-related products is not banned in South Africa, and the event itself is legal.

"This being the case, the association between the image and the product cannot be described as problematic," the ARB said.

For this reason, the poster was not offensive and problematic, it added.

Regarding the gender issue, the ARB conceded the advert sparked discomfort, given the use of a woman's disembodied body parts to promote a sex expo.

However, the image was neither degrading, overly sexual, or negative, it said, adding it did not find the ad to be gender stereotypical or a negative portrayal of women.

"It must also be noted that The Sex Expo is targeted at both men and women, and therefore intends to promote and depict the enjoyment of both sexes - consensually.

"The image depicted is, in fact, a rather tame expression of the event, and is product relevant. This is not, for example, the objectification of women to sell a car."

Children's safety

Regarding children's safety when it comes to advertising, the ARB stated adverts should not contain statements or visuals that might harm them mentally, morally, physically, or emotionally.

It said the image was not overly provocative, and the event being promoted was legal.

"While the association between the image and The Sex Expo would likely lead to some questions from enquiring children, the posters themselves do not contain any information about the content of the event, or what a person might be likely to encounter there.

"It also contains no information about the act of sex. This makes it entirely possible for a parent to explain as much or as little as they are comfortable with.

Given this, the ARB noted it was unfortunate families were exposed to these kinds of adverts - still, children have not been harmed mentally, morally, physically, or emotionally by this exposure.

Therefore, the ad does not hinder children's safety, it said.

Silence from The Sex Expo

The Sex Expo did not respond to the ARB regarding the advert.

This after the company was found to be advertising inappropriate content by the ARB in November last year.

In the advert, a woman was depicted removing her underwear, with only her thighs and knees showing.
sex expo
The Sex Expo advert from 2022 ruled inappropriate by the ARB (ARB)

The ARB ruled "while it is true that there is no portrayal of sexual body parts, the entire message of the image goes far beyond displaying lingerie - and rather suggests that the main purpose of the lingerie is to be removed.

"In this context, the directorate agrees with the complainant that the woman is portrayed in a way that objectifies and demeans her and depicts her as a sexual object and not as a fully formed human being."

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Should the Proteas pick Faf du Plessis for the T20 World Cup in West Indies and the United States in June?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes! Faf still has a lot to give ...
67% - 1097 votes
No! It's time to move on ...
33% - 533 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
18.76
+1.4%
Rand - Pound
23.43
-0.0%
Rand - Euro
20.08
-0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.25
-0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.12
-0.0%
Platinum
924.10
0.0%
Palladium
959.00
0.0%
Gold
2,337.68
0.0%
Silver
27.19
-0.0%
Brent Crude
89.50
+0.6%
Top 40
69,358
+1.3%
All Share
75,371
+1.4%
Resource 10
62,363
+0.4%
Industrial 25
103,903
+1.3%
Financial 15
16,161
+2.2%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE