Share

Stop using the term alt-right

accreditation

For the last couple of weeks you’ll have been bombarded with news stories about an unfortunately large group of individuals that have been referred to as the alt-right. 

In the scary new Trumpocalyptic era we find ourselves living in, racists and neo-Nazi nationalists have come crawling out of the holes they’ve been lurking in.

Oh, make no mistake. 

They’ve always been there, but now that Trump is officially president, they’re out louder and prouder than ever. 

Their rhetoric is characterised by bigotry, hatred and anything that isn’t white, straight and preferably male. (If female she’d better be demurely in her place.) And anyone who even thinks that they are simply a group wanting to protect and preserve their white ideals is not only ignoring the danger they represent, but are implicit in their blasé response to the narrative they represent.

Alternative right, or alt-right as it has been coined, is a term that is designed to make you think that as an ideology. The euphemistic name suggests their views are not as bad as you might think. 

Read more: Madonna can grab her crotch as much as she wants, Trump can't

The word alternative is one we associate with innocuous terms relating to its definition. Think different. Think edgy. Think unconventional, unusual or even unorthodox. Words that, on their own, have no connotation or connection with ideals that most sane people would outright reject and frown upon.

Mainstream conservatism in itself is often problematic, so moving away from that to establish and provide a platform that serves to normalise his and his followers’ racist rhetoric and ideal is even worse.

As one commenter in a Jezebel column notes, the term alt-right doesn’t frighten and repel people as the term neo-Nazi.  Yet, this is what these people are.

And Richard Spencer, the leader of the white nationalist National Policy institute, and recent subject of a rather delightful video in which he is punched by a protester, has no qualms about using this term as a means to make his views more mainstream.

(Oh and speaking of which: If you’re using the violence begets violence argument as a means to defend Spencer, then you might want to take a hard, long look at yourself.

Millions of Jewish people were killed during the holocaust and this is a man who identifies as a Nazi, and promotes genocide as an answer to white America’s problems.

Spencer embraces the beliefs, anti-Semitism and core values of those who resorted to any means necessary to eradicate Jewish people. There is nothing that can justify defending him. 

Oh, and another thing, for those of you who have been crying “ violence is not the answer,” did you protest when folk like Mike Brown, Tamir Rice and Eric Garner were killed by white police? Just asking. 

Because if you can protest when a white racist is being attacked, then surely you can raise your voice for marginalised voices that aren’t safe from the very people you’re defending. I mean, what’s a fatal gunshot in comparison to a punch, right?) 

Anyway, according to the Anti-Defamation League, Spencer established his platform in order to differentiate himself from the more traditional and mainstream conservatism, which is something I find so telling. 

...if we’re going to survive, we need to drop the euphemistic headlines that imply that things aren’t as bad as they seem.

Mainstream conservatism in itself is often problematic, so moving away from that to establish and provide a platform that serves to normalise his and his followers’ racist rhetoric and ideal is even worse. 

Read more: Stop pretending Americans voted for Trump because they're scared

And doing so under a guise of a label that presents itself as non-threatening is the worst and most insidious form of gaslighting there is.  And the problem is that people, including the media, are falling for it.

And while it’s easy to resort to humour as a way to respond to the dangerous rhetoric (the #alternativefacts hashtag on Twitter that went viral following US press secretary, Sean Spicer’s inaccurate claim about Trump’s inauguration numbers, is proof of this), what comes across strongly here is that people like Spicer, Trump and Spencer are telling the world they can do and say whatever they want.

Yes, we desperately need coping mechanisms in the dawn of a Trump era, but if we’re going to survive, we need to drop the euphemistic headlines that imply that things aren’t as bad as they seem.

Because they are. And right now, calling a spade a spade is a revolutionary act we should employ every chance we get in the fight against the increasing tyranny of a bigoted Trump society.

Read more:

Everything you need to know about the women's march in America

The most eye-catching posters from the Women's Marches against Trump


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE