Share

Adidas can’t freeze Kanye West’s $75 million Yeezy marketing payment

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Adidas lost a court bid to freeze $75 million it paid to Kanye West to market Yeezy shoes.
Adidas lost a court bid to freeze $75 million it paid to Kanye West to market Yeezy shoes.
Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images
  • Adidas lost a court bid to freeze $75 million (R1.4 billion) it paid to rapper and designer Kanye West to market Yeezy shoes.
  • US District Judge Valerie Caproni said that the company hadn’t shown it met the legal standard for a restraining order on the money.
  • For more stories, visit the Tech and Trends homepage.


Adidas lost a court bid to freeze $75 million (R1.4 billion) it paid to rapper and designer Kanye West to market Yeezy shoes.

At a Tuesday hearing, US District Judge Valerie Caproni in Manhattan rejected Adidas’ arguments that it needed a temporary restraining order to ensure that the funds remain available as its dispute with Ye over the blow-up of their partnership due to his antisemitic statements continues in arbitration. 

Adidas had cited press reports that Yeezy could be sliding toward insolvency in arguing that the funds were at risk.

But Caproni said the company hadn’t advanced any evidence to support that claim “beyond tabloid speculation.” She also said Adidas hadn’t shown that it would suffer “irreparable harm” if the funds weren’t frozen.

Caproni said it seemed likely that Adidas would ultimately prevail in recovering the $75 million in arbitration, where the company is contending Ye violated his contract by making antisemitic remarks.

But she said that the company hadn’t shown it met the legal standard for a restraining order on the money.

At the hearing before Caproni on Tuesday, a lawyer for Ye said the partnership contract called for Yeezy to receive $100 million a year from Adidas in quarterly installments.

It’s not clear if the $75 million Adidas sought to freeze is part of that annual payment, but the company claims the funds are restricted to marketing purposes.

Mark Goodman, a lawyer representing Adidas, declined to comment on the ruling.

The case is In the matter of Application of Adidas AG for an Order of Attachment in Aid of Arbitration, 22-mc-00320, US District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan)



We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Should the Proteas pick Faf du Plessis for the T20 World Cup in West Indies and the United States in June?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes! Faf still has a lot to give ...
68% - 1178 votes
No! It's time to move on ...
32% - 560 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
18.79
+1.2%
Rand - Pound
23.49
-0.3%
Rand - Euro
20.10
-0.1%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.27
-0.2%
Rand - Yen
0.12
-0.3%
Platinum
924.10
0.0%
Palladium
959.00
0.0%
Gold
2,337.68
0.0%
Silver
27.19
-0.0%
Brent Crude
89.50
+0.6%
Top 40
69,358
+1.3%
All Share
75,371
+1.4%
Resource 10
62,363
+0.4%
Industrial 25
103,903
+1.3%
Financial 15
16,161
+2.2%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE